Calls for investigation following errors made by Derbyshire council in hunt for a permanent Traveller site

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Calls have been made for a wider investigation following an inquiry into errors made by a Derbyshire council in its hunt for a permanent Traveller site – dubbed the “tip of the iceberg”.

A Derbyshire Dales District Council meeting last week (February 15) discussed a report into the authority’s assessment of a potential Traveller site at Hasker Farm, near Carsington Water for eight months, including liaising with a known convicted drug dealer.

The independent report, carried out by East Midlands Councils at a cost of nearly £5,000, partially upheld four out of 10 complaints made to the district council – implicating all of its councillors.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Now calls have been made for a wider independent investigation to further assess the shortcomings of the authority, with resignation demands for leading officers already being made.

A view of the site at ground level. (Image: Google)A view of the site at ground level. (Image: Google)
A view of the site at ground level. (Image: Google)

Council leader, Cllr Steve Flitter said the investigation may go further but also that it should be “put in the past”.

Paul Williamson, a Hasker Farm resident for the past decade, told the meeting the report was a “good start” but cannot be called an “investigation” due to its limited scope, the limited evidence it considered and due to the witnesses it did not interview.

He said the resulting conclusions were “fundamentally flawed and procedurally unfair” and felt there needed to be a “do-over” to avoid “severe legal and reputational jeopardy”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Sarah Dines, Conservative MP for the Derbyshire Dales, dubbed the Hasker Farm situation a “scandal”.

She said: “The findings at this stage are already damning and there is clearly more to come.

“Rather than accept the fact that very senior officers of this council have behaved in an appalling and unprofessional manner, all I have seen is attempts from the council to try and downplay the findings.

“This is the tip of the iceberg. Any of the attempts from the council to downplay the seriousness of the scandal will rebound on officers and those elected members of the council.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“There is no real difference between upheld and partially upheld complaints. You cannot be a little bit pregnant.”

Ms Dines said: “When you are in a hole, stop digging.

“The leadership of the council need to act fast otherwise they damage the reputation of the many good people that work at this council.

“It is time to come clean, the matter needs to be further investigated and frankly I for one expect proper resignations of those senior officers who have misled my constituents and me.”

Cllr Dermot Murphy said the reputational damage caused to the council was “truly unacceptable” and that he did not have “any confidence” in the results of the report, due to not all witnesses being interviewed.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He said: “The Hasker Farm must in my view go to the ombudsman for further investigation and scrutiny. Unless we do there will continue to be a black cloud hanging over the authority.”

Helen Mitchell, director of corporate and customer services and monitoring officer, said the authority apologised for any mistakes made, noting the “errors of judgement” made “as a result of pressure on officers from political leadership”.

Cllr Flitter said: “There are lessons to be learnt here and we have to do it in the correct way. “We have got to come together and look at how we do things, which we have been doing since day one, because we did not agree how the process was led in the first place.

“Transparency and governance was one of my main topics when we took over in May and that’s what I aim to try and drive this coun