Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Peak District windmill approved as park rejects concerns



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 June 2008
A controversial 60ft-high wind turbine has been given the green light – despite warnings it will be harmful and intrusive and could set a precedent.
Peak Park planning officers wanted the application for the windmill at Mount Pleasant Farm in Middleton-by-Youlgrave to be rejected.

Officers wrote in their report: "The turbine would be very prominent and intrusive within important landscape view
s.

"The resultant harm to the landscape could set a precedent for similar developments.

"The harm to perceptions of the national park landscape would have detrimental knock-on effects for tourism, and the economic and social well-being of the national park and its communities," they added.

But a Peak District National Park Authority planning committee voted in favour of the plans.

A national park spokeswoman said members decided environmental gains outweighed any potential harm to the landscape.

She added it would be two metres lower than nearby trees and would be shielded by the hilly landscape.

Applicant Stephen Maher was pleased by the decision and said renewable energy was increasingly vital due to climate change and high fuel prices.

Friends of the Peak District head of planning Andy Tickle, who spoke in favour of the plans at Friday's meeting, dismissed claims it would set a precedent.

Mr Tickle said: "We and the national park continue to judge applications on a case by case basis.

"We will support single turbines at isolated properties where there is no less intrusive option available.

"We were a bit surprised by the officer's view that it would be so prominent and disagreed strongly," he added.

But Derbyshire Dales Ramblers' Association was surprised and disappointed by the decision.

Countryside secretary John Riddall said: "It is contrary to the authority's policy that makes protecting the park the first priority.

"We will be watching to see the outcome and if the landscape is being damaged we will know with whom the responsibility rests."



The full article contains 326 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2008 3:51 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Bakewell
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.